Fix ECPG's handling of typedef names that match SQL keywords

Edit
Title Fix ECPG's handling of typedef names that match SQL keywords
Topic Bug Fixes
Created 2022-05-30 21:25:08
Last modified 2022-05-30 21:25:20 (3 weeks, 4 days ago)
Latest email 2022-05-31 15:09:23 (3 weeks, 3 days ago)
Status
2022-07: Needs review
Target version
Authors Tom Lane (tgl)
Reviewers Become reviewer
Committer
Links
Emails
SQL/JSON functions vs. ECPG vs. STRING as a reserved word
First at 2022-05-29 20:19:42 by Tom Lane <tgl at sss.pgh.pa.us>
Latest at 2022-05-31 15:09:23 by Andrew Dunstan <andrew at dunslane.net>
Latest attachment (handle-unreserved-typedef-names-1.patch) at 2022-05-30 21:20:15 from Tom Lane <tgl at sss.pgh.pa.us>
    Attachment (handle-unreserved-typedef-names-1.patch) at 2022-05-30 21:20:15 from Tom Lane <tgl at sss.pgh.pa.us> (Patch: Yes)
    Attachment (make-STRING-unreserved-1.patch) at 2022-05-29 20:19:42 from Tom Lane <tgl at sss.pgh.pa.us> (Patch: Yes)
History
When Who What
2022-05-30 21:25:20 Tom Lane (tgl) Changed authors to Tom Lane (tgl)
2022-05-30 21:25:08 Tom Lane (tgl) Attached mail thread 3661437.1653855582@sss.pgh.pa.us
2022-05-30 21:25:08 Tom Lane (tgl) Created patch record
Edit