Fix ECPG's handling of typedef names that match SQL keywords

Title

Topic

Bug Fixes

Created

2022-05-30 21:25:08

Last modified

2022-05-30 21:25:20 (3 weeks, 4 days ago)

Latest email

2022-05-31 15:09:23 (3 weeks, 3 days ago)

Status

2022-07: Needs review

Target version

Authors

Tom Lane (tgl)

Reviewers

Committer

Links

Emails

SQL/JSON functions vs. ECPG vs. STRING as a reserved word: First at 2022-05-29 20:19:42 by Tom Lane <tgl at sss.pgh.pa.us>
Latest at 2022-05-31 15:09:23 by Andrew Dunstan <andrew at dunslane.net>
Latest attachment (handle-unreserved-typedef-names-1.patch) at 2022-05-30 21:20:15 from Tom Lane <tgl at sss.pgh.pa.us>
Attachment (handle-unreserved-typedef-names-1.patch) at 2022-05-30 21:20:15 from Tom Lane <tgl at sss.pgh.pa.us> (Patch: Yes)
Attachment (make-STRING-unreserved-1.patch) at 2022-05-29 20:19:42 from Tom Lane <tgl at sss.pgh.pa.us> (Patch: Yes)

History

When	Who	What
2022-05-30 21:25:20	Tom Lane (tgl)	Changed authors to Tom Lane (tgl)
2022-05-30 21:25:08	Tom Lane (tgl)	Attached mail thread 3661437.1653855582@sss.pgh.pa.us
2022-05-30 21:25:08	Tom Lane (tgl)	Created patch record